earticle

논문검색

Context Priming in Body Part Metaphors

원문정보

Ekaterina Chon, Yoon-kyoung Joh

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

This study explores two different approaches to metaphors: the Conceptual Metaphor theory and the Relevance theory. Although these theories vary in many respects, they both attribute high values to context in interpretation of metaphors. Sufficient context allows speakers to use appropriate metaphors and listeners to draw on the right implicatures. Metaphor Prediction hypothesis was suggested by Martin (2007) and proposed that there are three types of context that allow for metaphor use. This study puts this hypothesis to question and tests it with the body part metaphors retrieved from the iWeb corpus. Most body part metaphors are highly conventionalized and are found in corpus without context priming in the way Martin (2007) suggests it. We conclude that context should be understood in a broader way than Martin (2007) does and provide an overview of connected studies in support of a global approach to context.

목차

I. Introduction
II. Previous Studies
2.1. Motivation and Processing of Metaphors
2.2. Implicatures and Context
2.3. Metaphor prediction hypothesis
IV. Results
4.1. Body and Head
4.2. Heart
4.3. Hand
4.4. Eye
21 Rob : Does Gladys have a good memory?Denise: Gladys is just like an elephant.In
V. Discussion
References
Abstract

저자정보

  • Ekaterina Chon Graduate student, Mokpo National University
  • Yoon-kyoung Joh Associate professor, Mokpo National University

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.