원문정보
Effects of Academic Engagement and Negative Psychological Tendency on Self-Directed Learning Ability among Undergraduate Students
초록
영어
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore self-directed learning ability and its affecting factors among undergraduate students. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was used. Using a convenience sampling method, data were collected from 196 undergraduate students enrolled in one national university. Negative psychological tendency (i.e. Type D personality), academic engagement, and self-directed learning ability were assessed using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, and analysis of covariance, Pearson’s correlation coefficients, and stepwise multiple linear regression, using SPSS/WIN 23.0 program. Results: The mean age of the students was 21.61±2.40 years and 56.6% were male students. Approximately, one third (n=67, 34.2%) of the students had Type D personality. The average scores of academic engagement and self-directed learning ability were 3.01±1.14 and 3.46±0.50, respectively. After controlling for sociodemographic variables, the Type D personality and academic engagement were significant predictors of self-directed learning ability (β=.64, p<.001; β=-.13, p=.021, respectively). This model explained 53.6% of the variance in self-directed learning ability. Conclusion: The study identified that Type D personality and academic engagement affect self-directed learning ability of undergraduate students, one in a negative way, the other in a positive way. Educators and educational policy makers need to make efforts to include interventions and strategies that increase academic engagement and change negative psychological dispositions such as D-type personality in the undergraduate education curriculum.
목차
서론
1. 연구의 필요성
2. 연구목적
연구방법
1. 연구설계
2. 연구대상
3. 연구도구
4. 자료수집
5. 자료분석
6. 윤리적 고려
연구결과
1. 연구대상자의 인구사회학적 특성
2. D-유형 성격과 학업열의 및 자기주도적 학습능력
3. 인구사회학적 특성과 D-유형 성격에 따른 자기주도적 학습능력
4. 학업열의와 자기주도적 학습능력의 상관관계
5. 자기주도적 학습능력의 영향요인
논의
결론
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
REFERENCES
