earticle

논문검색

Technical Paper

Intercomparison Exercise at Harshaw 6600, DVG-02TM, and D-Shuttle Dosimeters for the Individual Monitoring of Ionizing Radiation

초록

영어

Background: The main goal of experiments is to compare various operational and technical characteristics of D-Shuttle semiconductor personal dosimeters of the Japanese company “Chiyoda Technol Corporation” and Harshaw thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) manufactured by “Thermo Fisher Scientific” and DTL-02 of the Russian Research and Production Enterprise (RPE) “Doza” by their occupational and calibration exposure at various dose equivalents from 0.5 to 20 mSv of gamma-radiation. Materials and Methods: Besides dosimeters DTL-02, D-Shuttle and Harshaw TLD, there were also used: (1) the primary reference radionuclide source Hopewell Designs IAEA: G10-1- 12 with 137Cs isotope (an error is not more than 6% and activity is 20 Ci), and (2) the verification device UPGD-2M of RPE “Doza” and installed in the National Center for Expertise and Certification of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Kapchagai, the National Center for Expertise and Certification). Results and Discussion: The main results of researches are the following: (1) TLDs for Harshaw 6600 and DVG-02TM have an approximately equal measurement accuracy of the individual dose equivalents in the range from 0.5 to 20 mSv of gamma-radiation. (2) Advantages of dosimeters for Harshaw 6600 are due to the high measurement productivity and opportunity to indicate the dose on the skin Hp(0.07). Advantages of DVG-02TM consist of operation simplicity and lower cost than of Harshaw 6600. (3) D-Shuttles are convenient for use in the current and the operational monitoring of ionizing radiation. Measurement accuracy and 10% linearity of measurements are ensured when D-Shuttle is irradiated with dose equivalents below 1 mSv at the equivalent dose rate not higher than 3 mSv∙ hr–1. This allows using D-Shuttle at a routine technological activity. Conclusion: The obtained results of experiments demonstrate advantages and disadvantages of D-Shuttle semiconductor dosimeters in comparison with two TLD systems of DVG-02TM and Harshaw 6600.

목차

ABSTRACT
Introduction
Materials and Methods
1. Russian TLD system/badge design and operation and physics behind that
2. USA TLD system/badge design and operation and physics behind that
3. D-Shuttle, principle and parameters
4. Radiation metrology facilities and radiation environment
Experimental Results
1. Comparison of the TLDs and D-Shuttle responses on 137Cs for Hp(10)
2. Personnel dosimetry Case 1 comparison of TLDs and D-shuttle for Hp(0.07) and Hp(10) and Hp(3) assuming that both types of TLD badges were closely placed to each other but avoid shadowing of them
3. Personnel dosimetry Case 2 (in field) including doses for more than 1 mSv and dose rate more than 3 mSv∙hr -1
Discussion
Conclusions
Acknowledgement
References

저자정보

  • Dmitriy Spartakovich Kim Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kazakhstan
  • Kentaro Murayama Chiyoda Technol Corporation, Japan
  • Yernat Nurtazin Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kazakhstan
  • Yasuhiro Koguchi Chiyoda Technol Corporation, Japan
  • Yergazy Kenzhin Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kazakhstan

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.