earticle

영어

This study is about a relationship karma andkleśa in the Abhidharmakośabhāsya.
Like other abhidarma books, there are streams of thought through the system of dharmas in many ways.
The Sarvāstivādins insisted on prāpti and avijñapti theory in a real existent(dravyasat).
The Sautrāntikas say that the avijñapti does not really exist on as a substance; because it solely consists of not doing an action af-ter having undertaken not to do it; because one designates a thing which would exist by reason of past primary elements as avijñapti; now past dharmas no longer exist; and because avijñapti does not have the nature of rūpa; the nature of rūpa is rūpyate and since the avijñapti is not "susceptible of destruction"(apratigha), it cannot be rūpa.
they did not accept the idea that all dharmas exist in the three time periods and maintained that there was no difference between the intrinsic nature of a dharma and its activities.
Through karma andkleśa theories, we can think as a ability to enlightenment and our life aspects.