목차
목차
Abstract
I. Introduction
1. The Context
2. The FTAs in the world
3. Recent Trends of FTA in East Asia
II. Theoretical Arguments of FTAs
1. Trade diversion and trade creation
2. Domino Theory of FTAs
3. Rules of Origin and Spaghetti Bowl theory
4. Hub and Spoke theory
III. Korea's FTA Strategy and Its Motives
1. The Background of Korea's FTAs
2. The Features of Korea's FTA Strategy
3. The motives of Korea's FTA strategy
IV. China's FTA Strategy and Its Motives
1. The Background of China's FTAs
2. The motives of China's FTA strategy
V. A Comparison of China's FTA Strategy
1. Firstly, both Korea and China's FTA strategies share simultaneous multi-track basis, but have different features with the selction of their FTA counterparts.
2. To some degree, Korea and China's FTA strategies are both affected by hard and slow process of present unilateral and multilateral liberalization but reacted with slight difference.
5.3 Both countries' FTA strategies have deep-seated political consideration but differently serve their specific purposes.
5.4 Compared to China's FTA strategy, Korea's FTA strategy has a comparative advantage on its strategic planning and detailed tactics.
VI. Conclusions
References
Abstract
I. Introduction
1. The Context
2. The FTAs in the world
3. Recent Trends of FTA in East Asia
II. Theoretical Arguments of FTAs
1. Trade diversion and trade creation
2. Domino Theory of FTAs
3. Rules of Origin and Spaghetti Bowl theory
4. Hub and Spoke theory
III. Korea's FTA Strategy and Its Motives
1. The Background of Korea's FTAs
2. The Features of Korea's FTA Strategy
3. The motives of Korea's FTA strategy
IV. China's FTA Strategy and Its Motives
1. The Background of China's FTAs
2. The motives of China's FTA strategy
V. A Comparison of China's FTA Strategy
1. Firstly, both Korea and China's FTA strategies share simultaneous multi-track basis, but have different features with the selction of their FTA counterparts.
2. To some degree, Korea and China's FTA strategies are both affected by hard and slow process of present unilateral and multilateral liberalization but reacted with slight difference.
5.3 Both countries' FTA strategies have deep-seated political consideration but differently serve their specific purposes.
5.4 Compared to China's FTA strategy, Korea's FTA strategy has a comparative advantage on its strategic planning and detailed tactics.
VI. Conclusions
References
저자정보
참고문헌
자료제공 : 네이버학술정보