원문정보
초록
영어
The author studied the process of unifying Hanja variant groups of Korea and China for LGR (Label Generation Rule) of Internet Top-Level Hangeul Hanja Domain and possible confusion between Hangeul syllable and Hanja character. Among 3518 Chinese variant groups, Korea and China need not review variant groups which include no or just one Korean Hanja character. Korea and China reviewed 304 Chinese variant groups (9% of the 3518 Chinese variant groups) which include two or more Korean Hanja characters. By doing so, Korea and China succeeded in efficiently unifying variant groups. Unification process of variant groups which is the main core of Korea-China coordination and almost final unification result is summarized in this paper. In addition, the author analyzed systematically whether some Hanja character could be confused with a Hangeul syllable and obtained a good result which was not expected at the beginning. Probably this kind of systematic analysis has not been performed in the past and seems the first attempt, which is one of the contributions of this paper. The author also reviewed how to express K-LGR in XML for submission to ICANN.
목차
1. Introduction
2. The Concept of Hanja Variant and why Is it Problematic in Internet Domains?
2.1 What is a Hanja variant?
2.2 A special class of variants in mainland China: Traditional and Simplified characters
2.3 Simplitional character (简繁字)
2.4 Why are variants problematic in Internet domains?
2.5 List of 19738 Hanja characters and 3518 variant groups of China (C-LGR) as of 2016.07.20.
2.6 4819 Hanja characters and 50 variant groups in K-LGR v0.5 [12]
3. Selecting Variant Groups out of 3518 C Variant Groups to be Reviewed by K and C
4. The Process of Unification of Chinese Variant Groups
4.1 Before unification process began (2016.09.28., before Taipei meeting)
4.2 After Taipei meeting (2016.09.30): out of 258 Chinese variant groups, 215 solved and 43 unsolved
4.3 Almost final unification
4.4 K-LGR v0.7 [13]
5. The Possibility of Confusion between Hangeul Syllables and Hanja Characters
5.1 Confusion between Hanja and Hangeul syllable
5.2 Hanja components similar to Hangeul consonant or vowel letters
5.3 Hanja containing component similar to consonant letters and component similar to vowel letters
5.4 Hanja character as a whole which looks similar to Hangeul syllable
6. Representing K-LGR in XML according to RFC 7940
7. Conclusions and Jobs to be done in the future
7.1 Activities of KGP
7.2 Conclusions
7.3 Jobs to be done in the future
Acknowledgement
References