원문정보
초록
영어
The main aim of this study was to evaluate the perceived level of diffi-culty and fear of movement among patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) compared with asymptomatic subjects when they visualized motor control therapeutic exercises (MCTEs) commonly used in physio-therapy. Our secondary objective was to analyse the correlation be-tween fear of MCTEs and other psychological and disability variables. Thirty patients with CLBP comprised the treatment group, and 30 as-ymptomatic subjects comprised the control group. The procedure con-sisted of showing photographs and videos of seven MCTEs and having the participants rate their perceived difficulty and fear. Participants then answered a series of psychological self-report measures. Differences were found between groups in perceived difficulty of the MCTEs shown in videos (F=21.06, P<0.001) and photographs (F=15.86, P<0.001), as well as for perceived fear (F=9.71, P<0.001; F=8.61, P<0.001, respec-tively). Regression analysis indicated that in the CLBP group the predic-tor variable for perceived difficulty and fear was the lumbar disability (explaining 44% and 28% of the variance, respectively), however in the control group the predictor variables were catastrophizing and self-effi-cacy (38% and 34% of the variance, respectively). In conclusion, pa-tients with CLBP experience greater perceived level of difficulty and fear of movement when visualizing MCTEs than asymptomatic subjects. Psychological factors and disability were correlated with perceived dif-ficulty and fear when videos and photographs of exercises were shown.
목차
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design
Recruitment of participants
Outcomes
Procedure
Sample size calculation
Statistical analysis
RESULTS
Perceived fear toward photographs and videos
Perceived difficulty to photograph and video
Correlations analysis
Multiple linear regression analysis
DISCUSSION
Disability and perception of difficulty and fear
Self-efficacy, catastrophizing, and difficulty and fear perceived
Limitations
Clinical and scientific implications
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
REFERENCES