원문정보
Concurrent Use of Civil and Criminal Measures in Disposing the Bankruptcy Property ― from the Perspective of Crime of Illegal Deposits from the Public
형민교차와 파산절차에서 재산처리문제 — 공공예금을 불법흡수죄의 시각으로
초록
영어
There is concurrent use of civil and criminal measures in disposing the bankruptcy property, under the circumstances of that enterprise constitute the cause of bankruptcy and that enterprise or senior manager and controlling shareholders thereof constitute criminal suspects. Concurrent use of civil and criminal measures in disposing the bankruptcy property is an understudied topic in the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law. The improper intervention of public power tends to give adverse influence to social effects on relationship dispose of criminal law and civil law. From the perspective of crime of illegal deposits from the public, the paper focuses on the following three points, including the logic proven of bankruptcy proceedings are not suspended due to criminal procedures, the priority of the people's court accepting the bankruptcy petition taking preservation measures on all or part of the property of the debtor, and how to declare the creditor's right in the bankruptcy proceedings. From the view of jurisprudence basis of relation reconfiguration between criminal law and civil law for crime of illegal deposits from the public, the paper analyzes that the credit of victim shall be distributed in a same sequence with the common credit of bankruptcy. And the amount of the victim's right in the distribution shall be composed of the principal and its interest, but not of the deferred payment.
중국어
破产企业同时存在“企业构成破产原因”和“企业或企业高管、控股股东构成犯罪嫌疑”的情形时会发生刑民交叉问题。现行破产法理论和实践对破产程序中财产处置的刑民交叉问题研究不足。公权力不当介入往往对刑民关系处理的社会效果产生不良影响。故本文以非法吸收公众存款罪为视角,主要论述破产程序不因刑事程序中止的逻辑证成,破产程序对财产概括查控及清偿方面的优先性以及非法吸收公众存款案件中受害人如何在破产程序中申报债权。从刑民关系重构的法理依据看,本文分析了刑事受害人债权的清偿顺序与一般债权人相同。刑事受害人申报的破产债权数额应当包含借款本金以及未付借款利息,不包括迟延履行金。
목차
一、问题的提出
二、破产程序不因刑事程序中止的逻辑证成
三、破产程序对财产概括查控及清偿方面的优先性
四、非法集资刑事案件受害人在破产程序中申报债权
參考文獻
ABSTRACT