earticle

영어

Efforts towards regional revitalization are essential to reduce the economic recession accompanying the declining population. As one of the efforts, the viewpoint of tourism policy is indispensable. However, even if we want to develop that policy, we can’t tackle the whole country nationwide, so concrete remedial measures can’t be seen. It is clear that the "hollow out" agricultural settlement that lost the settlement function was specifically latent in a considerable proportion. From this situation it is urgent to maintain and survive the "hollow out" rural settlements. The social situation is on a downward trend, and the existing mechanism is beginning to fail. It is necessary to clarify the cause of this collapse and to take measures that do not lead to malfunction. In the framework brought up by Odagiri, three elements work and results will come out. However, in reality, only two of the three elements are functioning. Therefore, in this paper we will consider based on two cases, Yokote City, Akita Prefecture and Odika Town, Nagasaki Prefecture. As a result, when the three elements that constitute the "framework of revitalization of agriculture and mountain villages" function simultaneously, the results for regional revitalization are obtained, but in all cases three elements do not function at the same time, There is not enough effort made. What was clarified is that in each case only one of the other two elements, "Building an entity", which is made at the preparation stage before the start of activity, is functioning. "Creating a condition" is not functioning in "aiming interior assistance organization" because the financial and human foundation is weak. " Odika Island Tourism" is not stepping into "creating a place" with an emphasis on industry promotion. From this result, we concluded that the problem can be solved by combining the advantages of the two cases.

일본어

我が国の社会状況は縮小傾向にあり、既存の仕組みに綻びが出始めている。この綻び の原因を明らかにし、機能不全に陥らない方策を打つ必要がある。小田切が提起したフ レームワークは、3つの要素が機能して成果が出る。しかし、現実的には全ての要素が機 能しているわけではない。そこで本稿では、秋田県横手市と長崎県小値賀町の2つの事例 をもとに検討を行う。 結果として、農山村再生のフレームワークを構成する3要素が同時機能した場合、地 域再生に向けた成果が得られるのだが、いずれの事例も3要素が同時機能しておらず、十 分な取組みがなされていない。明らかになったことは、いずれも主体づくりは活動開 始前の準備段階で出来ているものの、狙半内共助組織体では、財政的・人的基盤が脆 弱であるため条件づくりが機能しておらず、おぢかアイランドツーリズムは、産業 振興に偏重し場づくりに踏み込めていないというように、1要素が機能していない。こ の結果から2ケースの利点を融合させることで、課題を解決させられるのではないかとい う結論に至った。