earticle

영어

This article aims to present practical alternatives for genuine reform that a majority of the people. In particular, the korean democratic crisis will review the institutional reform as view that it can overcome the reform of political relations the government’s constitution amendment, it can substantially advance democracy. Institutional development has binding power the behavior of individuals or groups. Because the system can change culture, and culture affects the system. Overall when compared with developed democracies; that seek between compromise and stability and social peace, is not nearly all is not a Presidential system but Parliamentary government or Semi-presidentialism. Parliamentary government, Semi-presidentialism has a longer term and stabler for more than Presidential system. It calls for a major change in the wisdom of the relationship between conflict resolution and the relationship between democracy and the democratic government. But constitutional reforms can never be a panacea. Also reform of the constitution does not mean that many structural problems can suddenly be solved. However, there is no such thing as false choice, as it is delaying institutional reform. It is necessary that the serious and repetitive the problem is, the more fundamental it is to innovate. Reform of the Constitution and the political relations law is one of the key pillars of fundamental reform. Importantly, institutional reforms are not necessary the best. But the sake of the Constitution should recognizes that it is a crucial task that must be reformed just like any other part. When the bring the Constitution and the political relations law to the extent of the problem what matters is the integration of civil participation, government organization and conflict and systems. Direct democracy, indirect democracy participation and institution are not a matter of choice between the two sides. It is not necessary to criticized participation by emphasizing representational democracy. Nor should we deny the cause of the introduction of participatory democracy. The choice between participation and the institution, centers of modern democracy, cannot be a desirable alternative. When the happens mixed democracy can be a viable choice for direct democracy based on representational democracy. In the 21st century, when we consider ourselves in Korean reality, sophisticated institution to transform; be regarded as an ideal regime, the Constitution into a more to transform the constitution. There is a need for a institutional designing of the development of human conditions connected to the well-being of human beings. because the institution should exist for human-beings.