earticle

영어

The economic value and socio-cultural value of specialized buildings have a great impact. The value of aesthetic architectural design led to the creation of added value such as an increase in the value of assets and an increase in the number of foreign tourists and visitors. Therefore, many countries and cities have made great efforts to make urban image making through specialized buildings. But exceptional architecture starts with designers with creative and technically superior competencies. If the designer's competence and the legal system and regulations to support it do not have the triple digits, excellent architecture will not be able to see the light of the world. If you do not have all the details such as purpose of construction design, specialization plan, space plan, and related regulations and technical review to be presented to the participants for the design competition, you should not select ‘work’, select ‘person’. The purpose of this study is to find out the problems and find alternatives through the case of Nakdong River Eco Center. In the case of the Nakdong River Eco Center, the design process based on the elected design was not able to be constructed according to the design of the wooden material according to the law. The problems at the Nakdong River Eco Center International Design Competition can be summarized as follows. First of all, it is a problem in the operation process such as making design guidelines by non-experts. If the relevant laws and regulations were thoroughly reviewed and the design guidelines for the public offering were made and presented after the technical review was completed, the design using wood would not have been submitted in the first place. Next is the unilateral process of design change. If design changes were inevitable due to the restriction of related laws, designers need to be actively involved in the design change so as not to undermine the design philosophy and concept of the designer. If public buildings built with enormous cost can not match the original philosophy and function, it can also be a social loss. In this study, the following three alternatives were proposed for a more efficient and high-level operation plan of the international architectural design contest. First, it is necessary to secure the public power by including the regulations on the drafting of the guidelines for the international architectural design competition, which is based on actual construction, in the ‘Building Service Industry Promotion Act’. Second, the level of awareness of stakeholders is enhanced through education. Third, it is necessary to build an integrated database for the international architectural design competition and to build a system that manages already completed projects, present and planned projects as a whole. In accordance with the WTO opening principle of architectural design market, the domestic architectural design market is also in need of in-depth discussion and research on the planning and operation of architectural competition in accordance with global standards and guidelines.