원문정보
초록
영어
This paper analyzes the scholarly approaches to the problem of “local” vs. “cosmopolitan” in the context of the cultural transfers between South and Southeast Asia. Taking the “localization” paradigm advanced by Oliver Wolters as its pivot, it reviews the “externalist” and “autonomous” positions, and questions the hermeneutical validity of the fuzzy and self-explanatory category of “local.” Having discussed the geo-environmental metaphors of “Monsoon Asia” and “Maritime Asia” as alternative paradigms to make justice to the complex dynamics of transregional interaction that shaped South and Southeast Asian societies, it briefly presents two case studies highlighting the tensions between the “local” and “cosmopolitan” approaches to the study of Old Javanese literature and Balinese Hinduism.
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction: Oliver Wolters and the “Indigenistic” Paradigm in Southeast Asian Studies
Ⅱ. Defining Southeast Asia—Between the “Externalist” and “Autonomous” Viewpoints
2.1. Cosmopolitanism Ante Litteram: From “Inde Transgangétique” to the “Greater India” movement
2.2. The “Autonomous” Paradigm
2.3. Towards a Change of Paradigm
2.4. The “Externalist” Reaction: The Sanskrit Cosmopolis
Ⅲ. The New Wave: An Emphasis on Networks and Synchronisms
Ⅳ. Redefining the Region: Monsoon Asia and Maritime Asia
Ⅴ. Revisiting the “Local”
Ⅵ. The Local vs. Cosmopolitan in Old Javanese and Balinese Studies
Ⅶ. Conclusion
References