earticle

논문검색

동아시아 근대사상의 내셔널리즘과 트랜스내셔널리즘 - 한중일 근대사상의 비교를 중심으로 -

원문정보

Nationalism and Transnationalism Found in East Asia Modern Thoughts

신현승

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

Recently receiving the spotlight in the forum for East Asian discourses is the transnational approach in Anthropology which observes and investigates historical, philosophical, social, cultural and political phenomena, transcending the regional, national and geographical borders. To view diverse phenomena, not from the perspectives of a given nation or its citizens, from more object angle, is the objective of transnationalism. What is, then, transnationalism? Nationalism in East Asia has been dubbed statism, ethnocentrism. ultranationlism, patriotism and such in Chinese Characters, stressing the societal ideiologies of ethnic group or nation. That is the ism which seeks unity, independence and development, or the ism in pursuit of national unity and integrity. Contrary to nationalism, trans in transnationalism means ‘beyond, or transcend’, thus indicating that transnationalism refers to ‘ultra nationalism’ or ‘ultra ethnocentrism’, irrespective of one’s nation, race or domain. As one anthropological trend, ultra nationalism has only been theorized a few years ago but a number of persons whose grounds for thoughts which are ultranational and trans-regional have been many. This paper originated from such issue. This paper analyzed the adoption of Western thoughts in the middle of 19th century aforementioned in the preface, and elements of nationalistic thoughts in response to it. In addition, it discussed the possible of overcoming ‘nationalism of thoughts’, presented by Confucian scholar named Han Ki Choi in the late 19th century, the Joseon Dynasty and his ‘study of qi ’supported by eclecticism of the East and West. Next, if further analyzed ‘transnationalism of thoughts’ introduced as an antithesis to the nationalism of thoughts, while extrapolating on the 「Eclecticism of East and West」. A comparative analysis of eclectic trends, namely China’s [Jungchaesuhyongron] and Japan’s [Hwahonyangjaeron]. First it mentioned Jeosen’s [Dongdosuhgiron] of contemporary era, followed by the confician scholar named Ki Suhn Shin in the late Joseon Dynasty. He has a proponent of fusion of Western and Eastern thoughts, and it correlation with transnationailsm.

목차

Ⅰ. 序言
 Ⅱ. 思想의 내셔널리즘을 넘어서
  1. 서구사상의 유입과 思想의 내셔널리즘
  2. 思想의 내셔널리즘에 대한 극복의 가능성
 Ⅲ. 思想으로서의 트랜스내셔널리즘
  1. 東西折衷論과 트랜스내셔널리즘
  2. 儒學者와 트랜스내셔널리즘
 Ⅳ. 結語
 <参考文献>
 要旨

저자정보

  • 신현승 Hyunseung Shin. 고려대학교 아세아문제연구소 HK연구교수

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 6,000원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.