earticle

영어

Whether it’s because of the case condition, adjustive measures to local conditions, or even further refinement rules or legislation followed suit, in pursuit of certainty for application of the exclusionary rules of oral confession from uncertainty of the legislation the precedent , the principles of the I ching can provide us the effective tool with a grasp of the change trend of the illegal confession exclusionary rules’ text and the model of judicial practice.It is because the eternal pursuit of justice, that exclusionary rules of oral confession have started from scratch, and developed from few to many in text and practice. Exclusionary rule of oral confession in different periods of history, regions, procedural stages as well as the concrete objects also has a different form of its expression. Illegally-obtained confession can be type into 4 kinds such as non-voluntary confessions, illegally-obtained confessions, confessions contrary to the principle of justice, and fruit of poisonous tree and repeated confession, which may not be strictly corresponds to the rules of strict exclusion, relative exclusion and discretionary exclusion. In fact, the boundaries between the above-mentioned types are still very fuzzy, and it is a doctrine of coping with shifting rules by sticking to a changeless principle, to stick to the voluntariness theory, the kernel of exclusionary rules of oral confession.

중국어

不论是因案制宜、因地制宜，甚至再进一步细化规则或者立法跟进，对口供排除规则的适用要从一种立法、判例的不确定之中去寻找确定性，易经的原则可以为我们提供一个把握非法口供排除规则文本流变趋势和司法实践样态的有效工具。正是因为对公正的永恒追求，口供排除规则从无到有地产生，从少到多地发展起来。而口供排除规则在不同的历史时期、地域、诉讼阶段以及具体对象上也有着不同的表现形式。非法自白可以被类型化为非任意性自白、违法取得的自白、有违公正原理的自白以及毒树果实和重复自白等形式，由此可能不严格地对应于绝对排除、相对排除和裁量排除等规则。其实，上述类型之间的界限仍然很模糊，而把握口供排除规则的任意性理论内核是“以不变应万变”之道。