earticle

논문검색

비대칭 동맹에서 방기 우려에 대한 대책 : 한미 동맹의 사례

원문정보

Appeasing the Fear of Abandonment in Asymmetric Alliances : The ROK-US Alliance Case

김영준

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

Every international alliances go through difficult times for various reasons. The dilemma created by the fear of entrapment and the fear of abandonment is one of the most common problems that international alliances face. In order to maintain stable alliance, the alliance members must deal with each other’s fear. This article analyzes the policies implemented by the Unites States to appease South Korea’s fear of abandonment by the U.S.. Right after the liberation of the country, Lee Suengman and other Korean right wing politicians began to worry about the U.S. government’s willingness to defend Korea from the communist threat. The U.S. government tried to reduce the size of its military in the Korean peninsula and Lee and his followers saw the troop reduction as a sign of U.S.’s abandonment of Korea. Their fear of abandonment was exacerbated when Dean Acheson, then the U.S. Secretary of State, delivered a speech at the National Press Club on January 12, 1950. In his Press Club speech, Secretary Ahceson warned that the United States would defend its possessions and occupied territories. Then he went on to say that “This defensive perimeters runs along the Aleutians to Japan and then goes to the Ryukus. ... The defensive perimeters runs from the Ryukus to the Philippine Islands.” The message that Lee and the right wing Korean politicians received from the speech was clear. The Korean Peninsula is not included in the Untied States’ defense perimeters. South Korean political leaders were afraid that Kim Il-Sung would interpret the speech as the way they did and attempt to make a radical movement. No more than six month later, the fear became real. Since then South Korean leaders’ fear of abandonment was one of the major sources rattled the US-ROK alliance. Therefore, in order to maintain a stable alliance relations with South Korea, the Unites States government had to take measures to relieve South Korean political leaders’ fear of abandonment. In this research, I identify three policies implemented by the United States government to stabelize the US-ROK alliance. First is the armament of South Korean military. Despite the risk of violating the Korean Armistice Agreement signed on July 1953, the U.S. government decided to strengthen South Korean Army by allowing arms transfer and arms sales to South Korean government. The weapons placed in Korea included nuclear armed Honest John missiles and 280mm atomic cannons. The Korean Armistice Agreement paragraph 13 (d) mandates that neither side introduce new weapons into Korean Peninsula, other than piece-for-piece replacement of equipment. Therefore, the deployment of nuclear weapons in South Korea was clear abrogation but the United States proceeded to protect South Korea. The second measure implemented by the United States was joint military exercises with the ROK military. As a measure to relieve South Korean leader’s fear of abandonment and a way to strengthen South Korean army’s combat skill, the U.S. conducted various types of joint military exercises with ROK military. The first joint exercises carried out were “Focus Retina” (FR) in March 1969. This was the reaction to the attempted assault on the ROK Presidential Residents and the Pueblo. The Purpose of FR was to show the ROK that even without support from their Okinawa base, the U.S. military was capable of deploying forces for the Korean Peninsula. It was the longest airborne assault operation in the history of the U.S. military: 700 men from the 82nd Airborne division traveled 13,679 km from Fort Bragg, North Carolina and dropped into Yoju, South Korea. In 1971, a second joint military exercise called “Freedom Vault” was conducted after the announcement of the Nixon Doctrine. Both the U.S. airborne and the ROK airborne increased numbers of soldiers and expanded the operation area. In 1976, yet another exercise was conducted called “Team Spirit” (TS) and was held between 1976 and 1993. Later it would become the largest scale joint military exercise not only for the ROK, but also for the U.S. as well. In the first year alone, a total of 46,000 soldiers from both sides participated. In the same year, another joint military exercise called “Ulchi-Focus Lens” (UFL) was conducted. UFL was the integration of the Taeguk Exercise of the ROK military and the U.S. military’s Focus Lens exercise. The third measure was creation of security consultation/ dialogue institutions such as CFC and MCM. In 1971, both countries agreed to set up Combined Forces Command where high ranking military officers from both side meet and consult on security related issues. In 1978, Combined Forces Command was created as more practical institution designed to cope with practical security issues. In this article, I argue these measures are implemented by the United States to relieve South Korean political leaders’ fear of abandonment and these measures ultimately stabilize and strengthened the US-ROK alliance over the years.

한국어

동맹의 종류나 그 목적에 관계없이 모든 국가간 동맹들이 상호신뢰의 문제와 연계되어 공통 적으로 겪게 되는 딜레마 중 하나가 바로 연루의 공포(fear of entrapment)와 방기의 공포(fear of abandonment) 이다. 연루의 공포란 동맹 당사국에 의해 벌어진 물리적 충돌 상황에 다른 동맹국이 자신의 의 지와 관계없이 휘말리게 되는 것에 대한 두려움을 의미하며 방기의 공포란 국가가 위기에 맞닥뜨렸을 때 원조를 제공하기로 한 동맹국가가 그 약속을 어길까봐 두려워 하는 것이다. 이 같은 연루와 방기의 공포는 동맹 국가 간 힘의 관계가 비대칭적일수록 더 심화되며, 동맹 당사국들은 상대방이 겪는 공포감 을 해소시켜 주어야만 동맹의 관계를 안정적으로 유지할 수 있고, 특히 상대적으로 힘이 강한 국가들은 약소국들의 방기의 공포를 해소시켜 주어야 한다. 비대칭 동맹이 겪는 연루와 방기의 딜레마는 한미 동맹도 예외가 아니다. 한국은 해방 이후부터 미국 과의 관계에 있어서 방기의 공포를 늘 겪어 왔으며, 역대의 정부들은 이를 해결하기 위하여 다양한 노력 을 해왔다. 이 논문은 한미 동맹이 체결된 이후 현재까지 유지되어 오는 과정에서 미국이 한국이 느끼는 동맹의 딜레마, 특히 방기의 우려를 해결하기 위하여 취한 정책들을 살펴보고 논의하고자 한다. 미국 정 부는 한국이 한미동맹에 대하여 느끼는 방기의 우려를 해소하기 위하여 크게 세 가지의 정책을 펼쳐왔 다. 그 정책들을 살펴보면 첫 번째는 한국군의 군비 증강 정책이다. 휴전 협정이후 미국은 정전 협정 위 반의 소지가 있음에도 불구하고 한국의 군사력 제고를 위하여 군비증강을 도왔다. 두 번째는 한미 양국 군대간 합동 훈련 실시이다. 1969년 포커스 레티나 훈련을 비롯하여 한미 양국군은 다양한 수준과 규모 의 합동 군사훈련을 실시함으로써 연합 작전 능력을 향상시켜왔다. 세 번째는 한미 양국간 안보 협의체 구성이다. 양국은 1968년부터 국방 각료들이 연례적으로 안보문제를 협의하다가, 1971년 ‘한미 안보협의 회의’를 구성한 것을 비롯하여 다양한 안보 문제 협의 기구를 구성하고 운영함으로써 한국 정부의 안보 관련 우려 사항들을 미국에 직접 전달하고 상시적으로 논의할 수 있는 통로를 구성함으로써 한국의 방 기 우려를 해소시켜 왔다.

목차

국문요약
 Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 한국의 방기 우려
  2.1 미국의 남한 방어의지에 대한 불신
  2.2 주한미군 병력의 감축
 Ⅲ. 한국의 방기 우려에 대한 미국의 대책
  3.1 한국군의 군비 증강
  3.2 합동 군사 훈련
  3.3 안보 협의체의 구성
 Ⅳ. 결론
 참고문헌
 Abstract

저자정보

  • 김영준 Young-Joon, Kim. 연세대학교 동서문제연구원 객원 연구원

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 5,200원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.