원문정보
초록
영어
In this study, we explore a condition where corporate debt can be strategically used in the stock market by governing its interpretations from investors. To disentangle the performance implications of corporate debt, we pay attention to the signaling aspect of debt financing. Acknowledging that investors can interpret the value of a firm with the level of debt, we postulate that debt can convey differentiated signals (i.e. driver vs. distress). In addition, we argue that the bifurcated role of debt can be moderated by marketing activities, which can affect the stakeholders’ interpretations. This idea is empirically examined in a population of SMEs (Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises). Using COMPUSTAT database of 2,174 U.S. public firms ranging from 1982 to 2010, we find resource-independent debt (called idiosyncratic debt) has bifurcated impacts on Buy-and-Hold Abnormal Returns (BHARs) and the marketing moderation of such relationship is also bifurcated.
목차
INTRODUCTION
THEORY AND HYPOTHESES
Non-Monotonic Signaling Effects of Corporate Debt in Valuation of SMEs
The Role of Marketing Intensity for Debt Signaling
METHODS
Sample and Data
Measures
Estimation Methods
RESULTS
Hypothesis Tests
Additional Analyses
DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS
Marketing as a Strategic Means to Control Debt Signaling
Debt Maturity and Firm Valuation
SMEs vs. Large Firms
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
