원문정보
Comparison of tidal volume of two different bag squeezing techniques in endotracheal intubation settings
초록
영어
Purpose: There is no recommended bag-squeezing technique for emergency medical providers to maintain correct tidal volume during mechanical ventilation. This study compared the tidal volume of two different bag-squeezing techniques during mechanical ventilation. Methods: The subjects were 38 paramedic students who were trained in airway management techniques. Two different bag-squeezing techniques were used with a bag valve mask on an intubated manikin: a conventional technique and a finger-marked, in which the bag is squeezed until the thumb and the middle finger come into contact. Hand size and grip strength were measured and analyzed statistically. Results: The mean tidal volumes for the finger-marked were significantly higher than those for the conventional technique (542.6±35.92 mL versus 338.0±111.15 mL, p<.001). There was a correlation between the two techniques (Pearson χ2 =1.160, p<.001). The subject’s characteristics, including sex, hand size, and grip strength, showed no correlation with tidal volume. Conclusion: A finger-marked bag-squeezing technique provides adequate and correct tidal volumes during mechanical ventilation.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
1. 연구의 필요성
2. 연구의 목적
3. 용어의 정의
Ⅱ. 연구방법
1. 연구 설계
2. 연구대상
3. 연구절차
4. 연구도구
5. 분석방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과
1. 일반적 특성
2. 백 압착법에 따른 일회호흡량의 차이
3. 백 압착법에 따른 일회호흡량 제공의 적절성 비교
4. 백 압착법에 따른 일회호흡량의 점도표 비교
5. 백 압착법과 압착 횟수에 따른 일회호흡량 비교
6. 일회호흡량에 영향을 미치는 요인
Ⅳ. 고찰
Ⅴ. 결론
References