earticle

영어

Confucius and Mencius’ influences have been great in the sphere of Confucian cultures. It is generally said that Confucian and Mencius' thought can be respectively integrated into jen(仁)and jenyi(仁義). Confucian jen reflects an existential aspect to reach the noble spirit and internal supremacy. Mencius added yi(義) which reflects a practical aspect to Confucian jen. Based on Confucian jen Mencius put grave emphasis on yi, which provides the principle of social activity. These jen and yi can be respectively compared with <ḥesed> and . Just as yi is based on jen, is based on <ḥesed>. However, in spite of the similarity between jen and <ḥesed>, jenyi and , it must not be ignored that there is difference between them. That is, on the other hand two masters' thought presupposes that human nature is good, <ḥesed> and presuppose relative goodness between Yahweh and Israel. Thus it is expectant that an effort for integrity of hermeneutic horizon and structural recognition may offer a wide and deep field of meaning.

한국어

공자의 중심사상은 ‘인’으로 집약되며, 맹자는 여기에 ‘의’를 추가하여 ‘인의’사상을 주장한다. 이 논문은 유학의 ‘인’을 구약의 ‘헤세드’에, 그리고 ‘헤세드’에 뿌리를 두고 있는 ‘공의’(미쉬파트와 쯔데크/쯔다카) 사상을 맹자의 ‘인의’사상과 비교한 후 그들의 의미의 유사성과 차이성, 중첩요소를 탐구하여 동양적 성서해석의 가능성을 모색한다.