earticle

영어

The objective of this study is to propose ways to improve the project planning process of public-private partnership(PPP) construction projects for cultural centers so that it is used to design public cultural centers which become a beloved and popular public space for cultural activities by residents of city. The study reviewed PPP project guidelines and previous projects in terms of structure of PPP project, procedure of establish a project plan, contents and meaning of preliminary feasibility study, and bid evaluation criteria. The study found following facts. The first, the preliminary feasibility study was too much focused on the political aspects of projects. The second, lack of flexibility in budget approved by national intensified difficulties to solve differences in interests of involved parties in a project and intensive studies and reviews on financial aspects of a project seemed to overlook characteristics of its regional environment and induce design proposals unrealistic or out of context. The third, evaluation criteria for the design and architectural design in detail criteria gained its relative importance every year. And each bid evaluation criteria gradually became similar to related field of specialties for juries and designer. However, it has a fundamental problem which makes the criteria hard to reflect user’s perspectives or symbolic value of the project. Therefore, this study proposes a few suggests. The first, citizen’s participation can be used from early stage of project to design a site-specific project. The second, the central government set up the more flexible plan and budget approval process for the projects. The third, types and scores of design evaluation criteria are need to be revised to accommodate user’s view on design. The hierarchy of the criteria also needs to be set by citizen’s participation using a systematic method such as the AHP.

한국어

본 연구는 복합문화시설의 민간투자사업 계획과정을 분석하였다. 가동률이 낮게 나타나는 복합문화시설을 주요 사례로 각 단계의 문제점을 분석하였고, 각 단계별 대안 제시와 함께 전 단계를 포괄하는 문제 또한 도출하여 전체적인 개선 방향을 제시하였다. 논문에서 주요 분석자료로 삼은 것은 사업기본계획과 그 수립과정에 대한 것으로 앞 단계는 뒷 단계에 지속해서 영향을 주고 있었다. 각 사업단계를 살펴본 결과, 사용자에 대한 고려가 부족한 것과 발주처인 지방정부의 예산에 대한 권한이 적음, 시설수요추정의 어려움, 디자인 중심의 평가가 아님 등이 포괄적인 문제점으로 제시된다. 이에 대한 사업 전반에 대한 제안은 사업 전반에 걸친 주민의 참여가 가능하도록 사업추진 체계와 기간의 조정, 지방정부가 시설사업비 조정이 용이하도록 제도 개선, 다양한 사용자의 가치를 반영하고 통합적으로 계획의 품질을 평가할 수는 평가 방법의 도입 등이 요구된다.