earticle

영어

In a study of existing brand reputation and brand reputation is high, low, good, bad, positive, negative, and explains that the absolute level of reputation and brand levels compared with competing brands. Such a level that previous studies have confirmed the presence of brand reputation, brand reputation, theoretically proven that description, the lack of research on the factors that lead to brand reputation, a strategy utilizing the brand reputation and brand reputation management has limitations have. So this study overcomes the limitations of existing research, the, to be able to develop and utilize strategies and manage brand reputation in the development theory, many researchers have commonly perceived value that describes the brand reputation is causing the brand reputation cause as a component of brand reputation that will be explained to the empirical validation. For the formative indicator in the structural equation model, the indicators can be defined in the properties of the latent variables, as the cause of the difference of latent variables which severity indicators that verification is possible. Therefore, this study was to utilize the formative indicator to verify that the indicators for the four perceived value (quality, price, emotional, and social) can be defined by the characteristics of the brand reputation to cause a brand reputation. In order to verify the formative indicators AMOS shall be verified through the formative indicators and reflective indicator in mixed MIMIC model. And the results are verified by the MIMIC model was verified by leveraging Two-Construct models to ensure that you have a theoretical construct validity. Questionnaire for this study was carried out by direct survey approach targeting two weeks, Kyung Hee University undergraduate and graduate students. 198 of 216 survey questionnaires are available utilizing the proportion of women (63.6%) was higher than in men (36.4%). Results are four kinds of perceived value (quality, price, emotional, social) have been identified as factors explaining the nature of the brand configured to cause a renowned brand reputation. Even theoretically correct perceived value factors identified factors that lead to brand reputation through a proven brand trust, brand reputation has been confirmed to have a positive impact on the brand you trust. Important factors for the four perceived value to induce brand reputation ranking of importance (quality, price, emotional, and social) are perceived quality, perceived social, perceived price, perceived feelings were confirmed by the order. Perceived value is a perception that the product level for the price the consumer wants, in previous studies of higher quality, perceived value positively asserted that higher prices higher perceived negatively. Perceived price identified as an important factor in causing the brand reputation is negative (-) by indicating the direction of the case to induce the brand reputation and quality without the high price because the perceived positive perception of social status, build brand reputation is negatively that it can be can be inferred from the findings. This was based on the perceived value of brand reputation is the result of empirical studies is that consumers think the price or brand reputation functionally superior quality than the emotional part, and it was confirmed that there is a greater significance to strengthen the social status. If the symbol of excellent features and social status through the results of this study and of the products that increase the quality products and trusted brands such as car less sensitive to price, on a positive impact on the purchasing process for consumers to take advantage of brand reputation is important as a marketing strategy must have been identified. And brand managers as a result that can contribute to the brand reputation management through the identification and comparison of competing brands on the main causes that affect building their brand reputation. Theory and practice would expect a greater contribution to the brand reputation.

한국어

기존 브랜드 명성의 연구에서는 브랜드 명성을 높고, 낮고, 좋고, 나쁘고, 긍정적이고, 부정적이라는 절대적 수준이나 경쟁브랜드와 비교하는 수준으로 브랜드 명성을 설명하고 있다. 이런 기존 연구들은 브랜드 명성을 확인하는 것 외에 브랜드 명성을 활용한 전략 수립이나 브랜드 명성 관리를 위해 활용하는 데는 한계점을 가지고 있다. 그래서 본 연구는 지각된 가치 4가지(품질, 가격, 감정, 사회) 측정지표가 브랜드 명성을 야기하는 중요한 구성 요인으로 브랜드 신뢰에도 영향을 미치는 것을 MIMIC 모형과 Two - Construct 모형을 통해 실증적으로 검증하였다. 지각된 가치 4가지(품질, 가격, 감정, 사회) 차원이 브랜드 명성을 유발하는 구성 요인임이 검증되었으며, 브랜드 명성을 유발하는 지각된 가치 4가지(품질, 가격, 감정, 사회) 차원 중 중요도 순위는 지각된 품질, 지각된 사회, 지각된 가격, 지각된 감정 순으로 확인되었다. 본 연구 결과는 선행 연구에서 검증되었던 지각된 품질 뿐 아니라 브랜드 명성을 유발하는 원인으로 지각된 사회도 소비자들에게 중요하게 지각됨이 확인되었으며, 부(-)의 방향이 나온 지각된 가격의 경우 품질과 사회의 긍정적 지각없이 높은 가격만으로는 긍정적 브랜드 명성을 구축 할 수 없음을 유추 해 볼 수 있다. 이 연구 결과는 브랜드 명성을 유발하는 요인으로 검증 된 지각된 가치 4가기(품질, 가격, 감정, 사회)를 통해 브랜드 관리자들은 자신의 브랜드 명성 구축에 영향을 주는 주요 원인에 대한 파악 및 경쟁 브랜드와의 비교가 가능하여 브랜드 명성에 대한 이론 및 실무적 기여가 클 것이라 예상한다.