원문정보
Null Operator Movement and Wh-in-situ
초록
영어
A wh-in-situ must be somehow associated with C, possibly as a way of scope taking, in order to ensure proper interpretation. So far, there have been two approaches concerning the fact that a wh-in-situ can have both a wide and a narrow scope. One is that a wh-in-situ undergoes movement at LF to the Spec of Comp by Aoun, Hornstein, and Sportiche(1981), Chomsky(1981), Hung(1982), Kayne(1984), Lasnik and Saito(1984), May(1985), Watanabe(1992), Tanaka(1999), and so on. The other is that a wh-in-situ does not undergo LF-movement at all and it is unselectively bound by the Q-operator instead. This approach was done by Pesetsky(1987), Stroik(1992), Aoun and Li(1993), Tsai(1994), Reinhart (1995), and so forth. In this paper, a new approach is proposed to explain why a wh-in-situ has an ambiguous interpretation. This approach along with the assumptions of Chomsky(1998, 1999) assumes that a null operator with an uninterpretable [wh] feature and an interpretable [Q] feature undergoes XP-movement overtly. With these assumptions, this paper shows that the reason that a wh-in-situ has both a wide and a narrow scope is the result of null operator movement to the position where the scope is marked.
목차
II. 공 운용자의 이동
1. 공 운용자 이동의 존재
2. 공 운용자의 범주
III. 자질일치와 공 운용자 이동
1. 자질일치와 엄격 순환적 도출
2. 다중일치에 의한 분석
3. 공 운용자의 이동에 의한 분석
IV. 결론
Works Cited
Abstract