earticle

논문검색

Subject Raising vs. Non-Subject Raising

원문정보

Lee DooWon

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

As far as the complement episodic predicate is concerned, there is a preference for the complement unaccusative predicate to be more salient than the unergative and transitive predicate, when the genuine subject undergoes RTO: that is, only the unaccusative and habitual unergative or transitive predicates are allowed in the embedded clause of the typical RTO construction. However such a restriction on genuine subject raising disappears in the case of non-subject raising. At this point, what is crucial is that the element in question, whether it is a genuine subject or non-subject, undergoes raising to the non-theta position of the upstairs clause, when RTO takes place. It has been newly shown that the complement indirect and direct objects can undergo RTO more freely than the complement genuine subjects. We have concluded that the peculiarities of non-subject raising are as follows. First, like the genuine subjects, the non-subjects such as initial DP on the possession-type MNC, adverbials, and indirect and direct objects can undergo raising from the complement sentence-medial position to the upstairs clause. Second, there doesn’t always arise Case alternation from nominative to accusative, when a non-subject undergoes RTO. Third, unlike the genuine subject raising, the non-subject raising is allowed even in the episodic predicate of the complement, when RTO takes place.

목차

I. Introduction
 II. Restrictions on Complement Subject Raising
  2.1 Previous Researches
  2.2 Restrictions on Genuine Subject Raising
 III. Non-Subject Raising
 IV. Conclusion
 Works Cited
 Abstract

저자정보

  • Lee DooWon 이두원. Chungju National University

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 5,100원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.