earticle

논문검색

On the So-Called Pseudo-Resultative Predicates

초록

영어

In a sentence like "Mary braided her hair tight", the sentence-final predicate tight is predicated not by any overt syntactic constituent, but by the hidden final result incorporated in the meaning of the verb, i.e. the braid resulted from the action of braiding. Calling these kind of predicates pseudo-resultative predicates, Levinson (2007) argues that they are semantically predicated by the root of implicit creation verbs like braid, and that this prediction is reflected in the syntax, assuming that the pseudo-resultatives are adjectives, and so it is possible for them, in the syntax, to be predicated by the root of an implicit creation verb, which is assumed to denote an individual. However, Levinson's compositional syntactic approach to the pseudo-resultative construction cannot be maintained for two reasons; first, contrary to her expectation, so-called pseudo-resultatives are not adjectives but adverbs, and so they cannot serve as the secondary predicate predicated by the root of the verb. Second, Levinson's suggested syntactic structure is problematic in that it exploits an impossible configuration, one in which P takes a propositional complement. Considering these problems, the puzzle of finding arguments for the so-called pseudo-resultatives should be solved not by a syntactic solution, but by a pragmatic interpretation rule like the Predicate Transfer.

목차

I. Introduction
 II. Preliminaries
  2.1. lmplicit Creation Verbs and Pseudo-Resultative Predicates
  2.2. Levinson's (2007) Compositional Approach to Pseudo-Resultatives
 III. Against Levinson's (2007) Compositional Syntactic Approach to the Pseudo-Resultative Construction
  3.1. Syntactic Decomposition of the Pseudo-Resultative construction
  3.2. Pseudo-Resultative Predicates as Adverbs
  3.3. Nonavailability of Propositional phrases as P's Complement
 IV. Further Discussion
 V. Concluding Remarks
 Works Cited
 Abstract

저자정보

  • Lee Chang-Su 이창수. Youngdong University

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보
  • 1The Syntax of Predication네이버 원문 이동
  • 2When Nouns Surface as Verbs네이버 원문 이동
  • 3Geuder, Wilhelm, (2000) Oriented adverbs: Issues in the lexical semantics of event adverbs,
  • 4Harley, Heidi, (2005) How do verbs get their names?: Denominal verbs, manner incorporation, and the ontology of verb roots in English. The syntax of aspect, ed. by Nomi Erteschik-Shir and Tova Rapoport, Oxford University Press
  • 5Jackendoff, Ray, (1990) Sematic structure, MIT Press
  • 6Linguistics And Philosophy네이버 원문 이동
  • 7Kratzer, Angelika, (2005) Building resultatives. Event arguments in syntax, semantics, and discourse, ed. by Claudia Maienborn and Angelika Wöllenstein-Leisten, Niemeyer
  • 8Legendre, Geraldine, (1997) Secondary predication and functional projections in French, Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory
  • 9Levinson, Lisa, (2007) The roots of verbs,
  • 10Marantz, Alec, (1997) No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. Proceedings of the 21st annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, volume
  • 11Mateu, Jaume, (2002) Minimalist account of conflation processes:Parametric variation at the lexicon-syntax interface.Theoretical approaches to universals,ed.by A.Alexiadou.Amsterdam:John Benjamins, John Benjamins
  • 12Mateu, Jaume, (2000) Why can’t we wipe the slate clean?: A lexical- syntactic approach to resultative constructions, Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics
  • 13Transfers of Meaning네이버 원문 이동
  • 14Osswald, Rainer, (2005) On result nominalization, Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9, ed. by Emar Maier, Corien Bary, and Janneke Huitink
  • 15Pylkkänen, Liina, (2002) Introducing arguments,
  • 16Ramchand, Gillian, (2006) Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax, University of Tromsø
  • 17Resultatives, Composionality and Language Variation네이버 원문 이동

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

  • 5,500원

0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.