earticle

영어

It is acknowledged that the Pre-negotiation System of urban planning is a very effective tool for estimating the development profit when the regulation of the lot such as zoning or floor area ratio (FAR) is to be changed to the better condition. However, current researches as to the Pre-negotiation System did not recognize the problems in spite of its strength. Therefore, the purposes of this paper is to introduce the issues of the Pre- negotiation System in Seoul as well as to suggest the alternatives to make the system more plausible. From the empirical analysis based on the previous literature studies and public documents associated with the Pre-negotiation System, it is found out that the present public contribution rates of the three case studies in Seoul are much higher than the rates of the public contribution guideline which are recommended in the System . Also, the inconsistency of the process during the pre-negotiation resulted in delay of time and unexpected social costs. Finally, as a policy implication, the results of the study suggest that it is advisable to apply additional FAR for the excess level above the guideline of public contribution as well as to establish the role of the individual group within the System to settle down the main issues of changing the current landuse regulation.