earticle

영어

The Sino-Japanese Verbs of [V+N]type can be used some section that relative the noun element or cannot it. In the case, but, the Chinese of [V+N]type can’t be usually used it. In the result, the equivalent words of [V+N]type are varied between the Sino-Japanese Verbs and the chinese. In the sentence with not an indirect object(the ni case) or a direct object(the wo case), Sino-Japanese Verb and the Chinese can be used same letters(alphabets). In the sentence with an indirect object(the に case) or a direct object(the wo case), however, Sino-Japanese verb and the Chinese cannot be used same letters. At a time like this, the Chinese system is had an independent structure is ｢ba＋something＋VN｣ type, which is the object before the verb. There are the verbs of [V+N] type in Chinese. one case can be used like a vocabulary, another case needs a kind of new noun ,which is an indirect object(the ni case) or a direct object(the wo case). The other case, it equals the Sino-Japanese Verb. The equivalent for the word is varied since the diverseness makes a start to the difference of the meaning and the grammar between two languages. That is, the Chinese language rarely gets the section in sentence , the Japanese language has a unique sentence structure and the letters of Sino-Japanese are not always same the china alphabets. I think to needs the study is some inconsistency between the Sino-Japanese Verb systems of [V+N] type and its grammar. Accordingly I should study the point later.