earticle

영어

This study has analyzed if there are any similarities and differences between the syntactic Japanese [te shimau] and Korean [a/e berita]. As a result, [te shimau] and [a/e berita] preceding the verb can rely on the company and the company muuiji. Japanese [te shimau], but it can be used with a state company [dekiru] [iru] Among the company muuiji, Korean [a/e berita] can not be used together. And [te　shimau] is showing human emotions [tereru] [uresikunaru] [sukida] can be used in conjunction with, but Korean [a/e berita] is unlikely to be used together. However, [te shimau], but can be used with the adverb [tyotto] [itsumo] [yoku], [a/e berita] may in some cases be used with the context according to the circumstances, there may not be written. Korean [a/e beorida], but can be used with negative format, Japanese [te shimau] as for the relationship between the negative and the format needs a little more research.

일본어

本稿では、日･韓両言語の｢てしまう｣と｢아/어 버리다｣が統辭的な面にはどのような類似点と相違点があるかを調べた。その結果、｢てしまう｣と｢아/어 버리다｣に先行できる動詞は意志動詞および 無意志動詞で、無意志動詞の中で状態動詞の｢できる｣｢いる｣と｢てしまう｣は共起できるが、韓国語の｢아/어 버리다｣とは共起できない。そして｢てしまう｣は、人間の感情を表す、｢照れる｣｢嬉しくなる｣｢好きだ｣などと共起が可能であるが、韓国語｢아/어 버리다｣は、結びつきにくい。副詞との共起で、｢てしまう｣は副詞｢ちょっと｣｢いつも｣｢よく｣と共起が可能であるが、｢아/어 버리다｣は文脈状況により、結びつく場合もある。否定形式との共起で、韓国語｢아/어 버리다｣は否定形式と共起できるが、日本語｢てしまう｣と否定形式との共起については、さらなる研究が必要である。