earticle

논문검색

Implicature and Process Leading to Implicature

원문정보

Heechul Lee

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

There is said to be two different kinds of meaning: one is sentence (word) meaning, the other speaker meaning. (Hurford & Heasley 1996: 3) Entailment and implicature both belong to inference. However, entailment concerns sentence meaning and implicature speaker (utterance) meaning even though we need to consider hearers to calculate the implicature of an utterance as shown in this paper. Grice (1975) claims that there must be a place for the natural counterparts of logical devices. In this vein, he discusses implicatures in terms of the Cooperative Principle and conversational maxims. Horn (1984) boils down the Gricean maxims to two fundamental principles, such as the Q Principle and the R Principle, and deals with implicatures in those terms. This paper discusses detachability related directly to conventional implicatures vs. conversational implicatures, and the inferential process leading to the implicatures, with illuminating English examples.

목차

영문요약
 I. Introduction
 II. Maxims and Principles
  2.1 Gricean Maxims
  2.2 Horn's(1984) Q Principle vs. R Principle
 III. Example Scenarios
  3.1 Violation of a maxim
  3.2 Opting out of a maxim
  3.3 Mediating a clash between two maxims
  3.4 Exploiting(flouting) a maxim
 IV. Datachability
 V. Quantity vs. Relevance
 VI. Process Leading to Implicature
 VII. Conclusion
 References

저자정보

  • Heechul Lee Lee, Heechul. Dept. of English, College of Education, Chonbuk National University

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.