earticle

영어

While centered around the theme of judicial development of company law against the macro-background characteristic of perfecting legislation and weakening jurisdiction, this dissertation presents an exploring research on the mechanism ensuring a positive reactive relationship and smooth dialogue between statute company law and jurisdiction thereof.The current research focuses on how jurists who bear the responsibility of forwarding decisions in specific cases by way of syllogism, interpret and develop company law in the absence of statute law adequately applicable to cases in hand ? Based on the legislative obstacles of the Company Law, like time lag, technicality and autonomy, judiciary has to create law for the incompleteness of the Company Law. In this process, it is the bottom of judicial intervention that should be concerned to be defended, which not only cannot threaten the existence of the spirit of company autonomy but also cannot to stifle the functions of company autonomy. Empirical methods are adopted in this research, in combination with the achievements by other scholars worked on related themes, the latest theoretical developments and overseas practices in similar areas as well, to deal with the challenges specified above. The purported purpose of this research is to work out a uniform mechanism for structuring a general theory on the theme so as to solve problems with respect to conflicts between decisions among individual cases, to find a way out of the dilemma between dynamic judicial innovations and the stability of legislation, and also to fill up the gap between company law theories and judicial practices and the leaks in statute company law. Based on the analysis of the influencing factors of judicial renewing, the article promotes the methodology foundation of the judicial renewing in Company Law. The macroscopic principle: under the guidance of believing in uniform judicial philosophy, prudent and rational discretion and foresight examination for implementation effect, it is through the categorized recognition and padding that the legal loopholes can be overcame.

중국어

基于公司法时滞性、技术性、自治性立法层面的障碍，《公司法》无法预期涵摄后出现 的社会关系是必然的，这也必将致使法律漏洞的产生，《公司法》这个无法弥补的先天遗 憾，却促使司法实践中不得不在一定程度上引入法官的主观能动性，法官在公司法立法 层面日趋完善而司法层面实施弱化的大背景之下，仍然依靠三段论的推理模式解决公司 法律规制阙如的司法困惑显然力不从心。司法不得不针对公司法律规则的不完备性进行 续造，以期弥补公司法理论与公司法实务之间的缝隙。只是司法续造的过程中应当注意 防守司法介入的底限，不仅不能威胁公司自治精神的存在，而且也不能窒息公司自治的 功能。文章在分析司法续造影响性因素的基础之上，为解决“同案不同判”的冲突，走出 司法能动性与成文法稳定性的两难困境，为填补公司法律漏洞提供统一的司法解决方案，提出公司法 司法续造的方法论基础。在宏观原则即：信奉统一的司法哲学、审慎理 性的司法裁量、实施性效果前瞻性考量的指导下，对于法律漏洞的克服，进行类别化识 别与填补。