원문정보
초록
영어
In recent days, there comes the interest in Urban Regeneration resulting from increase of income and qualitative expected level. At first, urban development was done by government which favors overall pulling down. However, this re-development based on destroy led to breakdown of community such as conflict between residents, and involuntary movement. A concept of Community Building starts to be newly lightened which emphasizes recovering community and quality of life. This study provides sustainable alternatives of urban regeneration and basic data for Community Building policy by analyzing Community Building campaign, and characteristics and actual situation of it. Comparison analysis method was used to analyze residual structure with literature research and some of domestic and foreign examples. The analysis showed that in inhabitants initiative model, local residents was core agent in each groups, trained own leaders to reinforce their community consistently, and NGO communicates actively with the professionals and had their own revenue, so they did not need to depend on authorities. In contrast, in public-private partnership model, the support centers which follows third sector method provided education, support for campaign, network forming and finance. These things led to continuous working with governance among inhabitants, administration and professionals. This study can give you some data for sustainable urban regeneration model and community formation.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
2. 방법 및 범위
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
1. 선행연구 검토
2. 마을만들기 개념
Ⅲ. 국내외 사례분석
1. 국내 마을만들기 사례
2. 국외 마을만들기 사례
3. 한국과 일본의 비교
Ⅳ. 결론
<참고문헌>