원문정보
Research between China domain name dispute resolution policy and the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
중국역명쟁의정책국제비교연구
초록
영어
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) established the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)for the generic top-level domains in 1999. The Policy’s operation can be described as fruitful and has obtained remarkable successes. Following the UDRP, the China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) adopted the Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for China ( a country code top-level domain) in 2001. The policy of CNNIC, binding the international practice and Chinese reality, not only protects the rights of the trademark owners, but also balances the interest of the domain name holders. With the appearance of many new top-level domains, It is necessary to analyze the differences and similarities between two policies in order for domain name holders and trademark owners to protect their own interests.
목차
1. 域名及域名行业
2. 国际域名争议政策与中国域名争议政策执行现状之比较
2.1 国际域名争议政策执行现状
2.2 国内域名争议政策执行现状
3.《统一域名争议解决政策》(UDRP)与CNNIC域名争议规则(CNNICDRP)内容比较
3.1 投诉人提起争议的权利依据不同
3.2 诉争域名的注册期限不同
4.《统一域名争议解决政策》(UDRP)与CNNIC域名争议规则(CNNICDRP)关于投诉成立的三个条件之比较
4.1 被投诉的域名与投诉人享有权利的商品商标或服务商标相同或混淆性相似
4.2 被投诉人对争议域名不享有权利或合法利益
4.3 投诉成功必须满足的第三个条件： 你方对该域名的注册和使用具有恶意
5. 结论
参考文献
About the Authors