earticle

영어

The end of Cold War and the development of information communication and transportation have reorganized the structure of the world, spreading globalization and eliminating borders between countries. Economy, energy resources, weather and environment, natural disasters, crimes, cyber security issues transcending borders have mass produced and furthermore embodied and broke down various threats in the area of non-conventional security. January 2012, the USA announced ‘National Strategy for Global Supply Chain Security’. The heart of the strategy is to protect national profits through the global supply chain and achieve economic growth for national prosperity. Emerging the Supply Chain Security (SCS) issue, which was generally considered in the fields of management and distribution, and considering it in the national security sphere, this report clearly shows that the domain of traditional national security which was centered in studying military threats such as wars, has now stretched out through the field of environment, energy and Human security. Keeping up with the US strategy for supply chain security, China is also preceding studies in this field. Both U.S and China is anxious in extending their sphere of power in the new realm of supply chain security with their political and economic power. However despite Korea should justly take notice of this relatively new issue, studies or reflection in policies in both government and public sector is yet unsatisfactory. Under the new system, now the world is coping not only in traditional economic exchange but also proactively discussing environmental security issues such as natural disasters or terrorism. Moreover, since the entire globe is now consolidating actual cooperation between states and seeking economical profits due to the expansion of supply security related technique market, both Korea and China should derive joint tasks to be dealt with and furthermore provide a cooperative scheme which corresponds to the international trend. Since the amity, Korea and China has actively exchanged social, cultural and economic matters, excluding politically sensitive topics such as history and North Korean Nuclear problem. However, there lies a restrictive limitation in schematic and periodic issues between the two nations. If the two successfully build up new cooperative system of supply chain security and consistently carries out cooperation, it may be possible to bring out good results from already-cooperative economy and furthermore create a new profitable platform of the two nations based on the growth power which enables sustainable development. Therefore, by proactively responding to the global trend of supply chain security and promoting mutual interchange and cooperation, Korea and China will double the benefits from economy and security.

중국어

冷战的结束、信息通信与运输工具的发展正在重组世界结构、扩大全球化、模糊国家间界线。经济、能源、气候变化、自然灾害、传染病、跨国犯罪及网络安全等问题在非传统安全领域导致了各种各样的威胁，且日益具体化、细化。就是说，随着国家间互相依赖的深化、人际交流和物质交流的活跃，在某一个地区发生的问题随时会影响到另外的地区，因此，国家需要构建应对新型危机的体系和政策。2012年1月，美国政府发布了≪全球供应链安全国家战略(National Strategy for Global Supply Chain Security)≫，其核心内容是，通过构建 “全球供应链系统”保护美国国民的安全并推动经济发展。该报告将原来的管理学与物流学领域的“供应链安全”(SCS, Supply Chain Security)延伸到了国家安全议题上。实际上此前学术界已经将过去以战争等军事威胁为主的国家安全问题的研究范围，扩大到了环境、资源、人类安全等方面。目前，全球各国互相合作构建所谓供应链安全的新型体系，试图在该体系下开展经济合作与安全合作，如共同应对自然灾害、恐怖袭击等。对韩国与中国来讲，通过供应链安全上的协作，两国可以强化相关部门之间的合作，还可以扩大有关供应链安全的技术市场，这可以增进两国的经济效益。因此，韩中两国需要尽快寻找可合作的课题，并采取符合国际形势的合作方案。