earticle

논문검색

오픈마켓 서비스와 상표권 침해

원문정보

Open Market Service and Trademark Infringement

김병일

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

Liability for contributory trademark infringement may be imposed where a manufacturer or distributor (1) intentionally induces another to infringe a trademark or (2) continues to supply a product to someone who it knows or has reason to know is engaging in trademark infringement. The test for contributory infringement focuses on manufacturers, distributors of products. There has however been an open question about whether or at least to what extent the contributory infringement doctrine even applied to services. Recently, cosmetics firm L'Oréal has failed in its bid to hold eBay responsible for the sale of counterfeit goods in France. A French court said that the online auction site had done all that it had to to stop counterfeit sales. Open market such as eBay, G-Market is an electronic marketplace, not a retailer, and never takes physical possession of goods sold through its website. eBay may be not liable for contributory infringement because it does not have sufficient knowledge of specific acts of infringement on its site and,when it does, it must act appropriately to discontinue the listing. This article has focused on four important constellations of liability - liability for open market service provider such as eBay, G-Market.

목차

Ⅰ. 서언
 Ⅱ. 오픈마켓 서비스 운영자의 법적 지위
  1. 통신판매중개자로서의 오픈마켓 서비스 운영자
  2. 통신판매업자의 상표권침해행위에 대한 오픈마켓 서비스 운영자의 책임
 Ⅲ. 상표권침해와 인터넷서비스제공자의 책임 및 그 제한에 관한 입법적 검토
  1. 개요
  2. 오픈마켓 운영자(ISP)의 책임 조항 도입의 검토
 참고문헌
 

저자정보

  • 김병일 Kim, Byung-il. 한양대학교 법학전문대학원 교수

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 7,000원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.