원문정보
초록
영어
The present study investigated the comparative effects of massed vs. distributed implicit focus on form (FonF) on the students’ short-term and long-term receptive L2 vocabulary acquisition. The participants (n = 45) were selected out of a population of 153 according to the result of the placement test and were randomly assigned to three groups of massed FonF, distributed FonF, and control group. The massed group was taught three short passages in which 28 target words were made typographically salient. Subsequently, they answered the comprehension questions presented after each passage during one session. The distributed group received instruction during three consecutive days. During each session they answered only one third of the comprehension questions. The control group received the same passages in which no words were made salient. The results of the immediate and delayed post-tests revealed the following: (a) both massed and distributed groups outperformed the control group in the post-tests; (b) there was no difference between the massed and distributed group in short-term vocabulary acquisition; and (c) the distributed group outperformed the massed group in the delayed post-test. These findings provide empirical evidence that Implicit FonF is beneficial to vocabulary learning; however, distributed FonF is more successful in long-term acquisition than massed FonF.
목차
Introduction
Review of Literature
Focus on Form (FonF)
Input Enhancement
Textual Enhancement
Method
Participants
Instruments
Pre-test
Passages
Comprehension questions
Immediate post-test
Delayed post-test
Glossary of words
Data Collection Procedure
Group 1 massed implicit FonF (visual input enhancement)
Group 2 distributed implicit FonF
Group 3 control group, i.e., no visual input enhancement
Data Analysis
Results
Pre-test
Immediate Post-test
Delayed Post-test
Discussion
Conclusion
The Authors
References
