earticle

논문검색

연구논문

의료과오소송에서 의사의 설명의무

원문정보

Explanation duty of doctor In case the malpractice suit

이정환

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

In rapidly modern society, awareness about medical practice expands unimaginably. Medical malpractice that has intrinsic, customary trait incre ases annually and a damage suit about malpractice also does. The doctor and patient should listen carefully each other in medical malpractice. They should exchange opinions while patient has to demand enough pre-explanation itself. In malpractice suit, explanation duty of doctor is that normally the patient can have to exert self- determination based on personal rights and in cluding explanation about symptom, content of therapy method, content of therapy method and danger when the doctor implements medical practice accompanying physical invasion. Such awareness is that patient is not just object treated but, subjective existence. Therefore importance of explanation about patient grows as meaning of self-determination of each individual. In connection with such explanation duty of doctor, the doctor does not give the patient enough explanation about possibility of bad result. If the doctor give the patient such like explanation, it is preliminary consideration of malpractice suit that the patient did not receive treatment. explanation duty of doctor is for patient’s choice as the patient compares fully necessity or danger with medical practice. the reason why we adopt non-violation theory of explanation to malpractice suit was started from proving obligation to relax theory.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 설명의무의 근거 및 법적 성질
 Ⅲ. 설명의무의 내용
 Ⅳ. 설명의무위반에 대한 증명책임
 Ⅴ. 설명의무위반의 효과
 Ⅵ. 결론
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

저자정보

  • 이정환 Lee, Jeong-Hawn. 서해대학교 부동산과 강사. 법학박사(민사소송법 전공).

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.