earticle

영어

“Reading out the pre-trial confession in court” is an intentional or unintentional omission in the Criminal Procedure Law of China, but the legislative loopholes are filled up by some judicial interpretations, moreover, reading out pretrial confessions is a kind of normal judicial practice. In China, “reading out the pretrial confession” functions as either substantial evidence or impeaching evidence, and is in a dilemma between self-incrimination and autonomous decision-making. So, to legalize reading out pre-trial confession, the judicial practice of Chinese country, on the one hand, should turn from the emphasis on “prohibition using illegal evidence” to “ban obtaining evidence illegally” in the application of illegal evidence exclusion rule; on the other hand, should bring forward three-sided relationship emphasized by principles of direct trial to the investigation phase from the trial stage.

중국어

“宣读审判前供述” 是中国刑事诉讼法的一个有意无意的遗漏, 这个立法漏洞被一些 司法解释填补了, 更主要的是宣读审判前供述是一种司法实践常态。 中国从诉讼原理而言, “宣读审 判前供述” 要经过 “非法证据排除规则”（合法性证明）和 “直接审理原则”的双重检验才可能真正成为 定案根据。 “宣读审判前供述” 摇摆于实质证据和弹劾证据的功能之间, 在自证其罪和自主决策之间 左右为难。 然而, 为了保障宣读审判前供述合法性, 我国的刑事司法实践, 一方面要在非法证据排 除规则适用上从强调 “使用禁止” 转向为强调“取得禁止”；另一方面要将为直接审理原则所强调的 三面关系从庭审阶段提前到侦查阶段。