earticle

논문검색

지방의원의 질적 평가 활동 가능성 탐색 - 서울시의회를 사례로 -

원문정보

Introduction to the Qualitative Evaluation for Local Councilors : Focusing on Seoul Metropolitan Council

이성우, 곽병훈, 이창언, 오수길

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

This study argues that local councilors can enhance their evaluation activities on the local governments by using the qualitative evaluation methodology based on their experiences and insights. The purpose of this study is to suggest that local councilors can be the qualitative researchers in the middle of talk time, speech, interpellation, or audit, and perform qualitative evaluation by gathering qualitative data such as interview, observation, and qualitative literature, and writing field notes. For this, it analyzed the official records of Seoul Metropolitan Council and identified the possibility to introduce and use qualitative evaluation to the local councilors’ activities. In addition, it suggested to use the specific methods such as systemization of evaluative comments, subdivision of evaluation items, and graphing of scorecards. Finally it argued that it require systematic education for local councilors on the qualitative evaluation methodology.

목차

Abstract
 Ⅰ. 문제제기
 Ⅱ. 지방의회의 평가 기능과 질적 평가의 논리
  1. 지방의회의 주요 기능과 질적 평가자로서의 지방의원
  2. 정책평가와 질적 평가
  3. 분석의 틀
 Ⅲ. 서울시의회 의원의 평가 활동
  1. 질문요지서
  2. 질의
  3. 세입세출예산 검토
  4. 행정사무감사
 Ⅳ. 질적 평가의 활용과 도입 방안
  1. 질적 평가 활용 방안
  2. 질적 평가의 도입 방안
 Ⅴ. 결론 및 정책적 제언
 참고문헌

저자정보

  • 이성우 Seong-Uh Lee. 한성대학교 교수
  • 곽병훈 Byung-Hun Kwak. 한국학중앙연구원 연구원
  • 이창언 Chang-Eon Lee. 한국방송통신대학교 강의교수
  • 오수길 Soo-Gil Oh. 고려사이버대학교 부교수

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.