원문정보
피인용수 : 0건 (자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)
초록
영어
Recognizing the importance of rebuilding New Orleans, this paper aims to analyze the rebuilding policies for New Orleans and compare those with an alternative policy which can make the city more sustainable, less vulnerable and more equitable. For this comparison, it analyzes four rebuilding policies as follows: Urban Land Institutes's Policy, the Bring New Orleans Back Commission's Original and Revised Policy, and Policy of Cherokee, IA. It is important that rebuilding New Orleans means not only rebuilding homes but also the lives and futures of people who has lived in the city.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
II. Problem Statement: New Orleans before and after Hurricane Katrina
1. Before Hurricane Katrina
2. Effects of Hurricane Katrina on New Orleans
3. Causal Model of Problems for New Orleans
Ⅲ. Evaluation Criteria for Rebuilding Policies: Literature Review
1. Safety
2. Equity
3. Affordable Housing or Financial Aid
4. Racial and Economic Diversity
5. Population Return
6. Citizen Participation
7. Cost
8. Ease of Implementation
9. Public Acceptability
IV. Identification and Evaluation of Proposed Rebuilding Policies
1. Urban Land Institute’s Policy
2. BNOBC’s Original Policy
3. BNOBC’s Revised Policy
4. Policy of Cherokee, IA
Ⅴ. Policy Comparison and Conclusion
1. Policy Comparison
2. Conclusion
References
Ⅰ. Introduction
II. Problem Statement: New Orleans before and after Hurricane Katrina
1. Before Hurricane Katrina
2. Effects of Hurricane Katrina on New Orleans
3. Causal Model of Problems for New Orleans
Ⅲ. Evaluation Criteria for Rebuilding Policies: Literature Review
1. Safety
2. Equity
3. Affordable Housing or Financial Aid
4. Racial and Economic Diversity
5. Population Return
6. Citizen Participation
7. Cost
8. Ease of Implementation
9. Public Acceptability
IV. Identification and Evaluation of Proposed Rebuilding Policies
1. Urban Land Institute’s Policy
2. BNOBC’s Original Policy
3. BNOBC’s Revised Policy
4. Policy of Cherokee, IA
Ⅴ. Policy Comparison and Conclusion
1. Policy Comparison
2. Conclusion
References
저자정보
참고문헌
자료제공 : 네이버학술정보