원문정보
초록
영어
Recently, enactment and amendment of laws for in-house subcontract workers and the precedent regarding in-house subcontract as temporary work agency are prevailing in Korea. This causes the difficulty in utilization of in-house subcontract and the increase of the conflicts on the distinction between in-house subcontract and temporary work agency. Therefore, in order to reinforce the industrial competitiveness and to minimize the confusion in industry it is necessary to provide solutions by considering the generous environments for the utilization of in-house subcontract and the stable application of the precedent to the distinction between in-house subcontract and temporary work agency in competing countries.
목차
Ⅱ. 도급과 파견의 구분 기준에 관한 사법부의 해석 경향 분석
Ⅲ. 사내하도급과 파견 근로 등 간접고용관련법 제ㆍ개정안 분석
Ⅳ. 사내하도급ㆍ파견 규율 관련 독일ㆍ일본의 유권해석 및 법제도 분석
Ⅴ. 검토 과제
참고문헌