earticle

영어

German law of residence-ownership have an effect on Korean and Japan law of it. But, they are different an another, and have a distinct characteristic. The collective building management rule is a means of decision-making. Management association makes it independently. It is a rule and a basic order of an organization to form a community. It is made by 'contracts' and 'resolutions' of divided owners. It has a special legal effect to transcend a contract that generates a credit. In other words, It is a supreme autonomic norms of divided owners-community. It is created, revised and abolished by agreement of three-fourths of divided owners. It contains important items to have to do with a ownership. A common sector on rules is what is turned by rule. It is occurred by authentic document and assembly- resolution of divided owners, and occurred by a declaration of intention and a rule in German. On French law a partitioned ownership-rule is a contract that is established by an agreement of divided owners. The standard apartment management rule is made use of normative reference by divided owners, when they make an apartment management rule. It can prevents a dispute, and promotes a harmony among divided owners. I think The Collective Building Management Rule of Korea has to be brought about an improvement. I hope that this paper help improve it.