earticle

논문검색

Shorting costs and asymmetry in mispricing

초록

영어

We hypothesize that overpricing shows up more often than underpricing if short-selling is costly relative to buying so that there is arbitrage asymmetry, and document the followings. First, put-optioned stocks, which are supposed to be less costly to short, have less anomaly profits than non-put-optioned stocks. Second, in highsentiment periods, short-legs of anomaly portfolios are more profitable with put-optioned stocks than non- putoptioned stocks, while, in low-sentiment periods, short-legs are not profitable with both subsamples of stocks. Third, returns on short-legs of anomaly portfolios are negatively related to lagged sentiment only when the degree of market-wide arbitrage asymmetry is high, where arbitrage asymmetry is measured by the difference of the market impact costs between the up market and the down market or by the market-wide average change in breadth. Finally, anomalies associated with capital investments do not seem to be caused by the presence of short-sale constraints.

목차

Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Data and measures
 3. Empirical results
  3.1. Cross-sectional variations in arbitrage asymmetry
  3.2. Time-series variations in arbitrage asymmetry
  3.3. Discussions
 4. Conclusions
 Reference
 Table

저자정보

  • Jangkoo Kang College of Business, KAIST
  • Hyoung-Jin Park Seoul Women’s University
  • Myounghwa Sim College of Business, KAIST

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 6,600원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.