초록
영어
Yoon, Jeong-Me. 2014. Variations in the Wh-island Effects of Wh-in-Situ in Korean - A Garden Path Approach. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 39-3, 505-547. Although wh-in-situ in Korean are known to show wh-island effects, there exist various environments where they show no wh-island effects. No satisfactory accounts are available for all the cases, and the goal of this paper is to show that there is a way to explain them once we recognize that wh-in-situ questions with a non-local wh-Q association, under the processing approach to island effects, are garden path sentences and that what is called the wh-island effects of wh-in-situ in Korean is not the ungrammaticality of wh-in-situ questions with a non-local wh-Q association but the high likelihood of misinterpreting such questions as having the local scope. Once we do so, explaining the variations in wh-island effects can be recast as explaining the variations in misinterpretation rates, and I explain them by first identifying various factors contributing to the (un)likelihood of misinterpretation and then showing that all the observed variations can be explained in terms of them. (Myongji University)
목차
1. Introduction
2. Variations in the Wh-Island Effects of Wh-in-Situ
2.1. Well-known Cases
2.2 Newly Identified Cases
2.3 Summary
3. Recasting the Question: From Variations in Degradedness to Variations in Misinterpretation Rates
3.1 Wh-island Effects of Wh-in-situ and Misinterpretation
3.2 Correlation between Wh-island Effects and Misinterpretation Rates
3.3 Recasting the Question
4. Different Reasons for No or Weaker Possibilities of Misinterpretation
4.1. Garden Path View of Wh-island Effects of Wh-in-Situ
4.2 Reasons for No or Fewer Misinterpretations
5. Explaining the Variations in Misinterpretation Rates
5.1 Enu NPs 'Which NPs'
5.2 Additional Wh Effects
5.3 The Embedded Context Case
5.4 Questions Ending with te
5.5 Echo Questions
5.6 The Declarative Intervention Case
5.6 Summary
6. Misinterpretation in the Syntactic Approach
7. Conclusion
References
