earticle

논문검색

평가자의 직업윤리 : 주요국의 평가윤리 원칙과 평가표준 비교

원문정보

Comparison of Evaluation Ethics : Ethical Principles and Evaluation Standards of USA, UK, France, Canada and Australia

한인섭

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

As the movement of performance evaluation prevails in governments and public sector, the more outside evaluators such as professors, accountants and consultants have been involved in the evaluation process. In this respect, we have much doubts whether the evaluators have the evaluation ethics. With these research questions in mind, we aim to review and compare the ethical principles and evaluation standards of USA, UK, France, Canada and Australia. This article shows that evaluation ethics have been adopted to improve the quality and the usefulness of evaluation and the establishment movement led by the evaluation communities of each countries have reflected the professionalization of evaluation. We found evaluation ethics have some limitations, of which the compliance of ethical principles and evaluation standards are most important. In this regard, we propose some recommendations such as improvement of the sensitivity of evaluation ethics, establishment and execution of ethical principle and evaluation standards, institutionalization and enforcement of the ethical program, and professionalization of evaluation. We expect this article would trigger the researches on the evaluation ethics.

목차

Abstract
 Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 평가윤리에 관한 이론적 논의
  1. 평가윤리의 의의
  2. 평가윤리의 기능과 역할
 Ⅲ. 각국의 평가윤리 원칙과 평가표준
  1. 미국
  2. 캐나다
  3. 영국
  4. 프랑스
  5. 호주
 Ⅳ. 평가윤리 원칙 및 평가표준의 특징과 한계
  1. 특징
  2. 한계
 Ⅴ. 결론 및 시사점
 <참고문헌>

저자정보

  • 한인섭 In-Sub Han. 조선대학교 행정복지학부 교수

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.