earticle

논문검색

연구논문

공소장변경의 필요성판단

원문정보

Determining the need for modification of an indictment

이존걸

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

This paper is about the judgment of determining the need formodification of an indictment theories and the criteria for the judgment ofdetermining the need for modification for studied. Truth discovery and substantive modification of an indictment theauthority to impose penalties the country, and at the same time to enableproper exercise of the accused can guarantee defense of the rightsinstitution. Thus, the court can modification of modification of reason modificationof an indictment occurs, the public prosecutor require. The public prosecutormust apply for modification of an indictment. An indictment should be changed in any case for the opposition to havea different theory. Most importantly, the public prosecutor receive anindictment want to judge described the defendant appeals the fact itself. In this sense, the theory is reasonable to mention the fact. SupremeCourt follows this theory. In fact, according to the change of these claims,and the fact that the defendant's defense of the changes result in asubstantial penalty if the concern is that should the need modification of anindictment.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
 Ⅱ. 공소장변경의 필요성판단에 관한 학설
 Ⅲ. 공소장변경의 필요성판단에 관한 판례
 Ⅳ. 맺는 말
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

저자정보

  • 이존걸 Lee, John-Girl. 전주대학교 사회과학대학 법학과 교수, 법학박사.

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.