earticle

논문검색

아감벤의 ‘목적 없는 수단’과 벤야민의 이미지로서의 역사철학 그리고 드보르 영화의 몽타주 기법

원문정보

Agamben’s ‘Means Without End’, Benjamin’s Historical Materialism, and Debord’s Cinema Poetics

윤교찬, 강문순

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

The main aim of this paper is to examine the interconnected worlds of poetics of the three theorists, Agamben, Debord and Benjamin, and to see what they commonly aim at. Agamben’s ‘Means without End’ reflects Debord’s cinema poetics. In Debord's cinema poetics montage image functions as ‘a prolonged hesitation between image and meaning' just as Agamben's pure means does as “uneasy hesitation” before the separation of the sacred and the profane. Debord's montage poetics, which aims not the return of the identical but that of the possibility of what was, perfectly matches with Benjamin’s notion of history as image. Just as Debord's montage image aims at the decreation of what was, Benjamin's view of history as image aims at a history of salvation. Each image, according to Benjamin, is charged with history and it is the door through which the Messiah enters. We also see Debord’s notion of spectacle helps us understand not only Agamben’s notion of profanation but also Benjamin's notion of secularization.

목차

I. 서론
 II. 벤야민의 이미지로서의 역사철학
 III. 세속화와 환속화
 IV. 결론
 인용문헌
 Abstract

저자정보

  • 윤교찬 Kyochan Yoon. 한남대학교
  • 강문순 Moonsoon Kang. 한남대학교

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.