earticle

영어

This study was aimed to compare isokinetic knee peak torque by angular velocity modification of traditional angular velocity (60-60°/sec) and isokinetic test protocol which isolated extensor(ER) and flexor(FR) as agonist and antagonist respectively. Twenty-five male university students were recruited as subjects. Subjects were performed two tests for the knee joint isokinetic peak torque tests through angular modification(60-60°/sec, 60- 90°/sec, 60-120°/sec and 60-180°/sec) and order of agonist(extensor and flexor; protocol A) and antagonist (extensor and flexor; protocol B). Protocol A started at 60(ER)-60(FR)°/sec and continued the progressive 60°(ER)-90° (FR)/sec, 90(ER)-60(FR)°/sec, 60(ER)-120°(FR)/sec, 120(ER)-60(FR)°/sec, 60(ER)-180(FR)°/sec and 180(ER)-180 (FR)°/sec which of dominant leg and non-dominant leg. protocol B started at 60(ER)-60(FR)°/sec and continued the progressive 60(FR)-90°(ER)/sec, 90(FR)-60(ER)°/sec, 60(FR)-120°(ER)/sec, 120(FR)-60(ER)°/sec, 60(FR)-180(ER)°/sec and 180(FR)-60(ER)°/sec. which of dominant leg and non-dominant leg. Angular velocity modification(60- 60°/sec and 60(ER)-90(FR)°/sec) of protocol A may be available for knee joint extensor peak torque between dominant and non-dominant leg and 60(ER)-90(FR)°/sec has the lowest coefficient variance(CV). And angular velocity modification(60(FR)-90(ER)°/sec) of protocol B may be available for knee joint flexor peak torque between dominant and non-dominant. In conclusion, To test peak torque, angular velocity modification may be available for rehabilitation patient group and elderly group as well as health group.