earticle

영어

The aim of this paper is to examine how Case-feature checking takes place in infinitival constructions under Chomsky's(1993,1995) Checking Theory of the Minimalist Program, In spite of its advantages mentioned and accusative Case assignment, the duplicate Case assignment and Exceptional Case marking. The Case-feature checking of an objective subject of the infinitival complement clause taken by ECM verb like 'believe' and 'expect' was made possible by Chomsky's(l991,1993) AgrOP Analysis under Pollock's(1989) SIH. But the solutions to the problems of Case Theory provided by Comskys's AgrOP Analysis becomes meaningless if AGR as a functional category which triggers Attract/Move-F is excluded from Grammar. As a matter of fact, Chomsky(1995) got rid of AGR as a functional category because of its irrelevance to Lf and PF. IF this is the case, the syntactic description of the nominative Case-checking in infinitival structures should be made in the following directions. First, the lexical properties of verbs must be fully explored. Second, the scope of syntactic analysis must be extended from sentence to discourse, because the reference relations of PRO have something to do with contexts. Lastly, the syntactic properities of TP must be explored, together with those of infinitive particle 'to'.