earticle

영어

The task of this paper is to attempt a definiton of the term "poetic language" and explore what it is that differentiates poetic language from ordinary language, what the intrinsic linguistic properties and the internal structure of the text which make it a poem, and how abstract ideas are usually conceptualized spatially on the basis of Jakobson's linguistic poetics, Mukarvsky's aesthetic semiotics, Lotman's poetics and Leech's theory of deviation in poetry. The focus on the message, the use of equivalence relations as the constitutive device of the sequence, the delimitation between sign and object, the use of sound figures, and the use of grammatical parallelism-- all of these are definitions for the poetic function as a whole. For poetrv, the ordinary language is the background against which is reflected the esthetically intentional distortion of the linguistic components of the work, in other words, the intentional violation of the norm of the ordinary The violation of the norm of the ordinary, its systematic violation, is what makes possible the poetic utilization of language. The function of poetic language consists in the maximum of foregrounding of the utterance. In poetic language foregrounding achieves maximum intensity to the extent of pushing communication into the background as the objective of expression and of being used for its own sake. Poetic language is a different form of language with a different function from that of the ordinary.