원문정보
보안공학연구지원센터(IJFGCN)
International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking
Vol.6 No.2
2013.04
pp.11-24
피인용수 : 0건 (자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)
초록
영어
Correct prediction of path loss is a pivotal step of WiMAX network planning to estimate external interference level and cell radius accurately. In this paper, different path loss models are compared depending on various parameters like frequency, height of receiver antenna, distance between transmitter and receiver etc. For comparative analysis, COST 231 Hata model, COST 231 Walfisch-Ikegami model, Stanford University Interim (SUI) model, Ericsson model, ECC-33 model and Free Space Path Loss models are used in three different environments (Urban, Suburban and Rural environments). After analyzing the results, it is found that no single model is suited or recommended for all types of propagation environments at 2.5 GHz frequency band.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Path Loss Models
2.1 Free Space Path Loss (FSPL) Model
2.2 COST 231 Hata Model
2.3 ECC-33 Model
2.4 COST 231 Walfisch-Ikegami Model
2.5 Stanford University Interim (SUI) Model
2.6 Ericsson Model
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Performance Analysis of Simulation Results in Urban Environment
3.2 Performance Analysis of Simulation Results in Suburban Environment
3.3 Performance Analysis of Simulation Results in Rural Environment
4. Conclusion
References
1. Introduction
2. Path Loss Models
2.1 Free Space Path Loss (FSPL) Model
2.2 COST 231 Hata Model
2.3 ECC-33 Model
2.4 COST 231 Walfisch-Ikegami Model
2.5 Stanford University Interim (SUI) Model
2.6 Ericsson Model
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Performance Analysis of Simulation Results in Urban Environment
3.2 Performance Analysis of Simulation Results in Suburban Environment
3.3 Performance Analysis of Simulation Results in Rural Environment
4. Conclusion
References
저자정보
참고문헌
자료제공 : 네이버학술정보