earticle

영어

The aim of this papers is to study the basic purpose that we consider the problem of interpretation in the text that deconstruction has practiced in many fields. The preeminent deconstructor, J. Hillis Miller, explains that deconstrution is not a dismantling of the structure of a text, but a demonstration that it dismantled itself. To deconstruct a text isn't to show all the high old context to be found in it. Rather, it is to show that a text can have intertwined discourses, strands of narrative, and threads of meaning. For critics practicing deconstruction, a literary text is neither a sphere nor an unbroken line with a definite beginning and end. A text consists the something inscribed in and inextricable from the myriad discourses that inform it. A unique of text hermetically sealed space. As it is perpetually opened to be seen in the contexts, and given text has the potential to be different from each time it is read. Deconstructors often turn to etymology, not to help them decide whether a means this or that, but rather as a way of revealing the several coincidence in the same text. Deconstruction is not really interpretation, the act of choosing among possible meanings. The purpose of deconstruction is to show the literature from structures of language which contradict the law of non-contradiction.