원문정보
초록
영어
In this paper, work has been extended to prolong the lifetime and energy proficiency of wireless sensor network. An idea of deterministic HEED has been proposed that take care of cluster head which has not been elected in 1/pi rounds. Here the comparative investigations have been reported to ascertain the performance of HEED, Multilevel Heterogeneous-Hybrid Energy Efficient Distributed Protocol (MH-HEED) and the Deterministic-HEED (D-HEED) for Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) in case of different deployment strategies. The results envisage that there is increase of about 364.3%, 268.7% & 300% comparing D-HEED over H-HEED, whereas this increase is about 25%, 22.9% &15.38% over MH-HEED in case of circular, grid and rectangular deployment strategies respectively.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Related Work
3. Cluster Formation in Heed Protocol
4. Network Model Assumptions
4.1. Case-I: Multi-level H-HEED (MH-HEED)
4.2. Case-II: Proposed D-HEED Protocol Design and Operation
4.3. A Set-Up Phase
4.4. Steady-State Phase
5. Node Deployment Strategies in case of H-HEED, MH-HEED and DHEED
5.1. Uniform Random Deployment
5.2. Grid Deployment
6. Results and Discussions
6.1. Case-I (Circular Deplyment):
6.2. Case-II (Grid Deployment):
6.3. Case-III (Rectangular Random Deployment)
7. Conclusions
References